BackKKALSHI

Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Winston R. Anderson and Christopher M. Sulyma in Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee

Yes0%

Vol$0.00

Outcomes2

TradeTrade on Kalshi

Event

MarketKALSHIactive

MarketKALSHIactiveOther

Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Winston R. Anderson and Christopher M. Sulyma in Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee

Part of: Will SCOTUS reject a benchmark requirement for ERISA fund-underperformance claims?

NoNo Price

100¢

VolTotal Volume

$0.00

Outcomes

Ends

Aug 1, 2028

in almost 2 years

Trade on Kalshi

Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Winston R. Anderson and Christopher M. Sulyma in Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee

100¢

Vol

$0.00

Outcomes

Trade

Yes0.1¢

No99.9¢

Price History

Will the Supreme Court rule in favor of Winston R. Anderson and Christopher M. Sulyma in Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee

No historical data available

Price history will appear here when available

Resolution Information

Status

Active

Expected Resolution

August 01, 2028

2:00 PM GMT+0

Official Sources

Markets are resolved using official government and institutional sources.

Learn more

Accuracy

100%

Resolved

8,750

Avg Time

< 24 hours

Disputes

Resolution Criteria

If the Supreme Court, in Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee, rules an ERISA plaintiff alleging imprudent investment based on fund underperformance need not plead a “meaningful benchmark", then the market resolves to Yes. The Payout Criterion for the Contract encompasses the Expiration Values that the Supreme Court of the United States has ruled that, for claims predicated on fund underperformance, a plaintiff alleging that an ERISA fiduciary breached the duty of prudence when investing plan assets is not required to allege a “meaningful benchmark,” after Issuance and before August 1, 2028. The market resolves to No if the Court holds that such a claim requires alleging a meaningful benchmark. A remand resolves to Yes only if accompanied by the foregoing merits holding; dismissal, dismissal as improvidently granted, or remand without deciding the benchmark question resolves to No. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.

Market Still Active

This market has not yet resolved. Resolution will occur after the specified end date based on the criteria above.

Resolution Info

Market Stats

Resolution Countdown

659 Days Left

August 01, 2028 • 2:00 PM

Last Updated

less than a minute ago

Event Group

Will SCOTUS reject a benchmark requirement for ERISA fund-underperformance claims?

Event

Will SCOTUS reject a benchmark requirement for ERISA fund-underperformance claims?