Regret Theory

#Definition

Regret theory is a behavioral economics framework proposing that people make decisions not just to maximize expected outcomes, but also to minimize the regret they anticipate feeling if their choice turns out poorly. The pain of regret—wishing you had chosen differently—is factored into decisions alongside objective payoffs.

In prediction markets, regret theory explains why traders often make suboptimal choices: avoiding bets they might regret losing, holding losing positions too long to avoid regret of selling at the bottom, or missing profitable opportunities because taking action risks regret while inaction feels safer. Understanding regret's influence helps traders recognize when emotions, not probabilities, are driving their decisions.

#Why It Matters in Prediction Markets

Regret theory reveals hidden forces shaping prediction market behavior.

Explains risk-averse undertaking

Traders often pass on positive expected value bets because the potential regret of losing outweighs the rational expectation of profit. A 60% probability at $0.50 is clearly +EV, but the anticipated regret of a loss can make traders hesitate.

Drives position management errors

Regret affects not just entry decisions but ongoing management. Traders hold losers hoping to avoid the regret of realizing a loss, and sell winners too early to lock in gains and avoid the regret of watching profits evaporate.

Creates asymmetry between action and inaction

Regret from action (a bet that loses) often feels worse than regret from inaction (missing a winning bet). This asymmetry causes traders to systematically under-trade, missing opportunities that rational analysis would recommend.

Interacts with outcome bias

After a decision, outcome bias judges the choice by its result. Before a decision, regret theory shapes the choice based on anticipated outcomes. Together, they create a loop: fear of future regret (regret theory) → conservative choices → bad outcomes judged harshly (outcome bias) → increased fear of future regret.

#How It Works

#The Regret Function

Traditional expected utility theory models decisions as:

Choose option with highest: Σ(probability × utility of outcome)

Regret theory adds a regret component:

Choose option that maximizes:
Σ(probability × utility) - Σ(probability × regret)

Where regret depends on:
- How much worse your outcome is vs. the alternative
- Whether you acted or failed to act
- How foreseeable the outcome was

#Components of Regret

#Action vs. Inaction Regret

Research consistently shows people experience more regret over actions that fail than inactions that miss opportunities:

Scenario A (action regret):
- You buy at $0.50
- Market resolves No (you lose $0.50)
- Regret: "I shouldn't have bet. I lost money."

Scenario B (inaction regret):
- You consider buying at $0.50
- You decide not to
- Market resolves Yes (you would have won $0.50)
- Regret: "I should have bet. I missed out."

Finding: Scenario A typically produces stronger regret than Scenario B,
even though the financial impact is identical ($0.50).

This asymmetry causes systematic under-trading.

#Numerical Example: Regret-Adjusted Decision

A trader evaluates a bet:

Standard EV analysis:
- Market price: $0.40
- Trader's estimated probability: 55%
- Expected value: (0.55 × $0.60) - (0.45 × $0.40) = +$0.15
- Decision: BUY (positive EV)

Regret-adjusted analysis (informal):
- If I bet and lose: "I wasted $0.40 on a losing bet"
  Regret intensity: High (action + loss + visible cost)
- If I don't bet and it wins: "I missed a good opportunity"
  Regret intensity: Moderate (inaction + forgone gain)
- If I bet and win: No regret
- If I don't bet and it loses: No regret, maybe relief

Regret-influenced decision: PASS
Even though EV is positive, anticipated regret from losing
outweighs anticipated regret from missing a win.

#Regret and Holding Decisions

Regret theory explains the disposition effect (holding losers, selling winners):

Holding a loser:
- Current position: Down 30%
- Selling now: Crystallizes loss, triggers regret
- Holding: Preserves hope, defers regret
- Regret-influenced decision: HOLD (avoid immediate regret)

Holding a winner:
- Current position: Up 40%
- Selling now: Locks in gain, feels good
- Holding: Risks giving back gains, potential future regret
- Regret-influenced decision: SELL (avoid potential future regret)

Result: Traders hold losers too long and sell winners too early.

#Counterfactual Thinking

Regret requires imagining alternatives—counterfactual thinking:

After a loss:
"If only I had..." (imagined better alternative)
- Not bet at all
- Bet less
- Waited for better price
- Chosen a different market

Intensity of regret correlates with:
- How easily you can imagine the alternative
- How close you came to choosing differently
- How often you're reminded of the better outcome

#Examples

#Example 1: Passing on Positive EV

A trader sees a market at $0.30 for an event they estimate at 40% probability.

Analysis:
- EV: (0.40 × $0.70) - (0.60 × $0.30) = +$0.10
- Clear positive expected value

Regret reasoning:
"If I bet $100 and lose, I'll feel terrible about
wasting $100 on something I wasn't sure about.
If I pass and it wins, I'll be slightly disappointed
but at least I didn't lose money."

Action: Pass on the bet

Outcome: Event occurs (would have won $70)
Actual regret: Moderate ("should have bet")
Counterfactual regret if bet and lost: Would have been higher

The trader's regret aversion correctly predicted their
emotional response, but led to an -EV decision pattern.

#Example 2: Holding a Loser

A trader bought at $0.60. Market has dropped to$0.35.

Rational analysis:
- Current belief: 30% probability
- Holding value: 0.30 × $1 - $0.35 = -$0.05 (should sell)
- Sunk cost of $0.60 is irrelevant to future decision

Regret analysis:
- Selling now: Locks in $0.25 loss, immediate regret
- Holding: Maybe it recovers, defers regret
- If I sell and it recovers: Maximum regret ("sold at the bottom")
- If I hold and it goes to zero: Regret, but "I was unlucky"

Action: Hold

The potential regret of selling before a recovery
outweighs the rational case for exiting a -EV position.

#Example 3: Selling a Winner Early

A trader bought at $0.40. Market has risen to$0.70.

Rational analysis:
- Current belief: 75% probability
- Expected value of holding: 0.75 × $0.30 = $0.225
- Should hold (EV positive relative to current price)

Regret analysis:
- Locking in $0.30 profit: Feels good, no regret
- Holding and it drops back: Regret of "gave back profits"
- Missing additional $0.30 gain: Less painful than losing $0.30 profit

Action: Sell at $0.70

Outcome: Market resolves Yes ($1.00)
The trader avoided potential regret of losing profits
but sacrificed $0.30 additional gain.

#Example 4: The "Almost" Effect

A trader considers two markets, bets on Market A:

Market A (chosen):
- Probability estimate: 60%
- Price: $0.55
- EV: +$0.05

Market B (not chosen):
- Probability estimate: 65%
- Price: $0.55
- EV: +$0.10

Outcomes:
- Market A: Loses (cost: $0.55)
- Market B: Wins (would have won $0.45)

Regret intensity: Severe
"I almost chose B. I should have done more research.
I made the wrong call."

If Market B had also lost:
Regret intensity: Much lower
"Both markets lost. I was just unlucky."

The near-miss of almost choosing the winner intensifies regret
beyond the objective financial difference.

#Risks and Common Mistakes

Letting anticipated regret override expected value

The core problem: regret aversion causes traders to avoid positive-EV opportunities. If fear of feeling bad about losses prevents you from taking good bets, you'll systematically underperform.

Asymmetric treatment of action vs. inaction

Feeling worse about bets that lost than opportunities missed creates bias toward inaction. Rationally, a $100 loss and a missed$100 gain are equivalent; emotionally, they're treated very differently.

Using regret minimization as the primary strategy

Some traders explicitly try to minimize future regret rather than maximize expected value. This leads to avoiding all uncertain positions, hedging excessively, and passing on edge. Regret minimization is emotionally comfortable but financially costly.

Post-hoc regret distorting learning

After losses, regret triggers search for "what I did wrong." Sometimes the answer is nothing—variance happens. Regret makes losses feel like errors, reinforcing outcome bias and distorting the learning process.

Regret from social comparison

Seeing others win on bets you passed intensifies regret beyond the financial impact. This can trigger FOMO-driven trading on the next opportunity, often at worse prices.

#Practical Tips for Traders

• Recognize regret-driven hesitation: When you're passing on a bet, ask whether you're avoiding negative expected value or avoiding anticipated regret. If your analysis says positive EV but your gut says no, regret aversion may be overriding rationality

• Pre-commit to decisions: Define entry and exit criteria before emotional regret considerations arise. Following a system reduces in-the-moment regret calculations

• Reframe inaction as a choice: Not betting is a decision too. Ask "Will I regret not betting if this wins?" as much as "Will I regret betting if this loses?" Balance the regret asymmetry consciously

• Use position sizing to manage regret: If regret from potential loss prevents a bet, consider a smaller position. Some exposure to +EV is better than none. Size positions so that losses are tolerable emotionally

• Track counterfactual outcomes: Keep a record of bets you passed on and how they resolved. This provides data on whether your regret-driven passes are actually protecting you or costing edge

• Separate regret from error: Feeling regret doesn't mean you made a mistake. A good decision can have a bad outcome. Use expected value analysis, not emotional response, to evaluate decision quality

• Accept that regret is unavoidable: Any choice can lead to regret (action regret or inaction regret). You can't eliminate regret; you can only ensure you're making decisions for rational reasons rather than to minimize an emotion

#Related Terms

• Outcome Bias
• Expected Value (EV)
• Risk Management
• Behavioral Finance
• Gambler's Fallacy
• Loss Aversion
• Calibration

#FAQ

#How is regret theory different from loss aversion?

Loss aversion says losses hurt more than equivalent gains feel good (e.g., losing $100 hurts more than winning$100 feels good). Regret theory says the emotional experience depends on counterfactual comparison—what could have happened. You can experience regret even from gains (selling too early) and the intensity depends on how close you came to a better outcome. Loss aversion is about objective outcomes; regret theory is about the comparison between actual and imagined alternatives.

#Can regret ever be useful for trading decisions?

In limited ways. Anticipated regret can prevent impulsive, high-risk bets that you'd truly regret. It can also motivate thorough analysis before committing capital. However, regret as a primary decision driver tends to produce overly conservative behavior. The goal is to make regret one input among many, dominated by expected value analysis rather than dominating it.

#How do professional traders handle regret?

Most develop emotional discipline that separates regret from decision evaluation. They evaluate trades by expected value, not outcome, and accept that good decisions sometimes lose. Many use systematic approaches (algorithms, strict rules) that reduce emotional decision-making. They also take long-term perspectives: a single regret-inducing loss matters less when viewed as part of thousands of trades.

#Does regret theory apply differently to prediction markets vs. stock trading?

The principles are the same, but prediction markets have binary, time-limited outcomes that may intensify certain regret patterns. There's no "it might recover later"—at resolution, you've definitively won or lost. This finality can reduce the disposition effect (no point holding losers past resolution) but may increase anticipated regret before entering positions, knowing the outcome will be unambiguous.

#What's the relationship between regret theory and outcome bias?

They're complementary. Regret theory describes how anticipated emotions shape decisions before you know outcomes. Outcome bias describes how actual outcomes distort evaluation after the fact. Together, they create a feedback loop: fear of future regret causes conservative choices, and then outcome bias makes any losses feel like validated errors, increasing future regret aversion. Breaking either part of this cycle improves decision-making.

---

Meta Description (150-160 characters): Learn Regret Theory: how anticipated regret shapes prediction market decisions, why traders avoid good bets, and how to overcome regret-driven trading errors.

Secondary Keywords Used:

• anticipated regret
• regret aversion
• counterfactual thinking
• action vs inaction
• behavioral economics