$83.00K
1
9
$83.00K
1
9
Trader mode: Actionable analysis for identifying opportunities and edge
This market will resolve according to the combined outcome of who will be confirmed as the next Fed Chair and whether the Fed’s lower bound will reach 2.5% or lower (https://polymarket.com/event/what-will-fed-rate-hit-before-2027) at any point by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. This market will resolve to “Other” if an outcome not listed occurs within the specified timeframe. This market may resolve as soon as the respective conditions are met. The rules and resolution criteria are as follows
Traders on prediction markets currently believe there is about a 7 in 10 chance that Kevin Warsh will be confirmed as the next Federal Reserve Chair and that interest rates will stay above 2.5% through 2026. This is the leading forecast among several possible outcomes. The market suggests a clear, though not certain, expectation for who will lead the Fed and the general path of interest rates over the next few years.
Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor, is often viewed as a candidate who would prioritize controlling inflation. His past writings and policy leanings suggest he might be less likely to cut interest rates aggressively compared to some other potential nominees. The prediction that rates stay above 2.5% aligns with this view, indicating traders think the Fed will maintain a relatively higher rate environment to ensure inflation is fully managed.
The context here is the upcoming 2024 U.S. presidential election. The next president will nominate the Fed Chair, with the term of the current chair, Jerome Powell, ending in May 2026. Markets are essentially placing bets on the election's outcome and the subsequent policy direction. Warsh is seen as a likely pick for a potential Republican administration, and the rate forecast reflects a continuation of cautious monetary policy rather than a quick return to the near-zero rates seen before 2022.
The main event shaping this prediction is the U.S. presidential election on November 5, 2024. The winner's economic team and their preferred nominee will become clear in the months following the election. The official nomination and Senate confirmation process would then occur, likely in early 2026 before Chair Powell's term ends. For the interest rate part of the bet, every Federal Open Market Committee meeting and inflation report between now and December 2026 could shift expectations, but the political appointment is the first major hurdle.
Prediction markets have a mixed but interesting record on political appointments. They can be efficient at aggregating insider gossip and political intelligence, often outperforming polls in the weeks before an official announcement. However, for an event this far in the future—tied to an election and multi-year economic policy—the uncertainty is very high. Current odds are a snapshot of today's political winds, which can change. Markets for long-term economic conditions, like where rates will be in 2026, are even less reliable, as they can be swayed by unexpected economic shocks. This forecast is a useful indicator of current conventional wisdom, but it should be seen as highly fluid.
The Polymarket bundle predicting the next Federal Reserve Chair and future interest rates shows a clear favorite. The outcome "Kevin Warsh as Chair with rates staying above 2.5%" trades at 71¢, implying a 71% probability. This indicates strong market conviction that Warsh will lead the Fed and that his policy will prevent deep rate cuts through 2026. The other eight possible chair-and-rate combinations share the remaining 29% probability. With only $83,000 in total volume, this market lacks deep liquidity, so large trades could shift prices significantly.
The high probability for Kevin Warsh reflects his status as a reported frontrunner for the role should Donald Trump win the November presidential election. Warsh, a former Fed governor, is viewed as a more hawkish candidate likely to prioritize inflation control over aggressive rate cuts. The bundled condition on rates staying above 2.5% is directly tied to this hawkish perception. Markets are pricing in a scenario where a Warsh-led Fed would be slower to ease policy, even in a slowing economy, keeping the federal funds rate higher for longer. This contrasts with potential Democratic-appointed chairs who might be perceived as more dovish.
The entire market hinges on the U.S. election outcome on November 5, 2024. A Trump victory would likely solidify Warsh's odds and could push this bundle's price even higher. A Biden victory would collapse the Warsh scenario, causing a massive reallocation of probability to outcomes involving Lael Brainard, Lisa Cook, or other Democratic candidates. The rate component adds another layer of risk. A severe economic recession in 2025 or 2026 could force even a hawkish Fed to cut rates toward 2.5%, invalidating the "stay above 2.5%" condition and causing this leading bundle to resolve as "No." Key inflation and jobs data over the next two years will constantly test this thesis.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
This prediction market combines two distinct but interconnected questions about U.S. monetary policy. First, it asks who will be confirmed as the next Chair of the Federal Reserve. Second, it asks whether the Federal Reserve's benchmark interest rate, the federal funds rate, will fall to 2.5% or lower by December 31, 2026. The market resolves based on the combined outcome of these two events. The current Fed Chair, Jerome Powell, was sworn in for a second term in May 2022, and his term expires in May 2026. This creates uncertainty about future leadership at the central bank. Simultaneously, after an aggressive series of rate hikes to combat inflation, markets are speculating on when and how deeply the Fed might cut rates in the coming years. The intersection of leadership transition and the path of interest rates makes this a complex forecast of both politics and economics. Investors, policymakers, and analysts are closely watching because the outcome will signal the future direction of monetary policy, affecting everything from mortgage rates to business investment. The market's structure reflects a bet on whether a new chair, potentially with different economic views, will preside over a significant easing cycle.
The Federal Reserve Chair is typically appointed to a four-year term, with recent chairs often serving multiple terms. Alan Greenspan served from 1987 to 2006, Ben Bernanke from 2006 to 2014, and Janet Yellen from 2014 to 2018. Jerome Powell, first appointed in 2018, is now in his second term. Historically, sitting chairs have been renominated by presidents of both parties to maintain market stability, but this is not guaranteed. The last time a sitting chair was not renominated was in 1978 when President Carter replaced G. William Miller with Paul Volcker. The federal funds rate has experienced dramatic shifts. In response to the 2008 financial crisis and the COVID-19 pandemic, the Fed cut rates to near zero. The post-2021 inflation surge prompted a sharp reversal, with the rate rising from 0.25% in March 2022 to a target range of 5.25%-5.50% by July 2023, its highest level in over two decades. The question of whether it will drop to 2.5% by 2026 hinges on whether the Fed believes it has sustainably defeated inflation and needs to support a slowing economy.
The identity of the Fed Chair and the level of interest rates directly influence the cost of borrowing for households, businesses, and the government. A chair perceived as more dovish (favoring lower rates) or more hawkish (favoring higher rates) can shift market expectations instantly, affecting stock and bond valuations. For the average person, this impacts mortgage rates, auto loans, and credit card APRs. A rate cut cycle to 2.5% would provide relief to borrowers but could also reignite inflationary pressures if done prematurely. The decision carries global weight. The U.S. dollar and Treasury yields are benchmark assets worldwide. A shift in U.S. monetary policy leadership or stance can trigger capital flows into or out of emerging markets, affecting their economic stability. Domestically, the Fed's actions will influence the unemployment rate and wage growth, making this a central issue in the political economy of the next presidential term.
As of spring 2024, the Federal Open Market Committee has paused its rate hikes and is signaling potential cuts later in the year, but the timing remains data-dependent. Inflation has cooled from its peak but remains above the 2% target. Jerome Powell has not publicly commented on his interest in a third term. Political attention is focused on the November 2024 presidential election, which will set the stage for the Fed Chair nomination process in 2025. Financial markets, as reflected in futures contracts, are pricing in several rate cuts through 2025, but expectations for the endpoint vary widely.
The nomination process typically begins in the year preceding the term expiration. Since Jerome Powell's term ends on May 15, 2026, President Biden or his successor would likely nominate a candidate in late 2025 or the first quarter of 2026 to allow time for Senate hearings and confirmation.
The federal funds rate is the interest rate at which depository institutions lend reserve balances to other banks overnight. It is the primary tool the Federal Reserve uses to influence economic activity and inflation. It forms the basis for many other interest rates in the economy.
Yes. During the 2001 recession and its aftermath, the Fed cut the federal funds rate to a low of 1.0% in 2003. It was raised to 5.25% by 2006, then cut again during the 2008 crisis. The rate was at 2.5% briefly in late 2008 before being slashed to near zero.
The President nominates the Fed Chair, and the nomination must be confirmed by a majority vote in the United States Senate. The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs holds confirmation hearings first.
The Fed would likely cut rates aggressively to 2.5% if the economy entered a significant recession, unemployment rose sharply, or inflation fell sustainably below the 2% target. It would be a response to a need for substantial economic stimulus.
Educational content is AI-generated and sourced from Wikipedia. It should not be considered financial advice.
9 markets tracked
No data available
| Market | Platform | Price |
|---|---|---|
| Poly | 70% |
| Poly | 23% |
 | Poly | 5% |
 | Poly | 3% |
 | Poly | 2% |
| Poly | 1% |
 | Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
| Poly | 0% |
No related news found
Add this market to your website
<iframe src="https://predictpedia.com/embed/e3y1sP" width="400" height="160" frameborder="0" style="border-radius: 8px; max-width: 100%;" title="Predicted Fed rate under each Fed Chair"></iframe>