Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by...?
PM $14.21M
1
1
Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by...?
PM $14.21M
1
1
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $14.21M
Reported volume · provider units
1
Saved contracts
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 15, 2026, 4:13 PM UTC
About This Event
This market will resolve to "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Venezuela between September 6 and December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". For the purposes of this market, land de facto controlled by Venezuela or the United States as of September 6, 2025, 12:00 PM ET, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country. The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible sources.
This saved analysis is awaiting a background update. Its prices and claims may be outdated; compare them with the dated market data above.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-13T09:10:12.733Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The supplied Polymarket rules state that the market "will resolve to "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Venezuela between September 6 and December 31, 2025, 11:59 PM ET." [1] The same excerpt says that land "de facto controlled by Venezuela or the United States as of September 6, 2025, 12:00 PM ET, will be considered the sovereign territory of that country." [1]
The market title, however, reads "Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by December 31, 2026?" [1] The rules window and the title therefore name different years. The listed end time is 2027-01-01T04:59:00.000Z [1]. Readers should rely on the full resolution text from the provider rather than the title when interpreting this contract. The excerpt is also cut off mid-sentence at the resolution source description, so the source of resolution cannot be confirmed from the evidence.
Reading the snapshot
The saved snapshot was observed at 2026-10-13T09:10:12.733Z and retrieved at 2026-10-13T11:52:28.994Z [1]. The provider status is recorded as active [1]. The quoted prices were Yes 0.031 and No 0.969 [1]. These are snapshot prices, not executable quotes, and they are not verified probabilities.
The sample contains one market from one event on one platform. The coverage record shows one market total, one included, and no partial sample [1]. Because no other outcomes or platforms are in the evidence, no comparison across contracts is possible. Volume is not included in the supplied evidence, so nothing can be said about liquidity or the number of participants.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not explain why the price is where it is, and this analysis does not attempt to. It does not show whether the market has traded recently or how prices have changed over time.
The mismatch between the 2025 rules window and the 2026 title is the most important open question. The excerpt does not clarify which date governs resolution, and the listed end time falls after the rules window. Readers should check the full rules on the provider page before drawing conclusions.
Finally, the snapshot is a single moment. It should not be treated as a current quote or as a forecast of the outcome.
References
- Polymarket: Will the U.S. invade Venezuela by...?. Provider data observed 2026-10-13T09:10:12.733Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 13, 2026 UTCOverview
This PredictPedia contract asks whether the United States will commence a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Venezuela. The provider's rules state that the market resolves "Yes" if such an offensive begins within a stated window, and "No" otherwise [1]. The rules also say that land de facto controlled by Venezuela or the United States as of September 6, 2025, 12:00 PM ET, will be treated as sovereign territory of that country [1]. This matters because the contract is about control of territory, not only about a formal declaration of war or a general military deployment. The contract's wording and its dates need careful reading. The title and market record refer to a deadline of December 31, 2026, and list an end time of January 1, 2027 at 04:59 UTC [1]. The retrieved rules text, however, describes a resolution window of September 6 to December 31, 2025, ending at 11:59 PM ET [1]. The evidence does not resolve this difference, so readers should check the provider's current rules before relying on any particular window. A date written in the rules is a contract term, not an announcement that any event is scheduled. The provider lists this market as active [1]. The stored record is a snapshot taken at a specific time, not a live view, and a listed end time is not the same as the moment the contract resolves. The evidence does not describe how the final resolution will be determined beyond stating that a consensus source is involved [1].
Historical Context
A Wikipedia article on United States and Venezuela relations states that the diplomatic relationship between the two countries was strained during parts of the 21st century [3]. A separate Wikipedia account describes an operation that began around 2 a.m. local time on 3 January 2026, when explosions were observed in Venezuela. According to that account, United States forces bombed infrastructure across northern Venezuela to suppress air defenses, and an apprehension force attacked Maduro's compound in Caracas [2]. The same account reports that approximately 80 people, including Venezuelan and Cuban military and civilians, died, and seven American soldiers were wounded [2]. The operation was codenamed Operation Absolute Resolve [2]. This is historical background from encyclopedia sources. The evidence does not establish how this operation relates to the contract's resolution criteria.
Why It Matters
The contract measures whether a United States military offensive aimed at establishing control over some part of Venezuela begins within the window stated in the rules [1]. The rules define the territory issue by referring to de facto control as of a specific time in September 2025, which means the contract does not depend only on formal sovereignty claims [1]. Because the historical events described in the encyclopedia sources occurred in January 2026 [2], whether they fall inside the contract's window depends on which dates govern, and the evidence does not settle that question. Market prices reflect a snapshot of trading activity at one time and are not verified probabilities of the outcome [1].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-13 at 09:10 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
Does the January 2026 operation determine how this contract resolves?
The evidence does not establish that. The retrieved rules describe a window from September 6 to December 31, 2025 [1], while the market title refers to December 31, 2026 [1]. A Wikipedia article describes a United States strike and capture operation on 3 January 2026 [2], but it does not say how that event should be classified under this contract's rules.
What counts as a military offensive under these rules?
The rules say the market resolves "Yes" if the United States commences a military offensive intended to establish control over any portion of Venezuela [1]. The excerpt does not define further terms such as what level of activity qualifies, so the exact interpretation should be checked against the provider's full rules.
Is the listed end time the same as the resolution time?
No. The provider record lists an end time of 2027-01-01T04:59:00.000Z [1]. The evidence does not describe the resolution process or when a final outcome will be determined, so the listed end time should not be read as a confirmed resolution date.
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Reviewed equivalent pairs
0
No currently reviewed equivalent pairs with both binary Yes prices are available.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
