Skip to main content
Market snapshot: . Prices may have changed since this snapshot.
Events
GroupKALSHIPOLYMARKETCross-Platform

US-Iran nuclear deal?

US-Iran nuclear deal?
Vol

PM $20.18M · K 3.78M contracts

|
Events

2

|
Markets

10

Current odds

Snapshot from

As of Oct 21, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC, the highest-priced outcome on Polymarket is December 31 at 14.5%, and on Kalshi it is Before Jan 20, 2029 at 34.5%.

Polymarket

  1. December 3114.5%
  2. November 308.5%
  3. October 310.8%

Kalshi

  1. Before Jan 20, 202934.5%
  2. Before Jan 1, 202830%
  3. Before Feb 1, 202713%
  4. Before Jan 1, 202712.5%
  5. Before Mar 1, 202712.5%

Yes prices. They are not order quotes; check each platform's rules, fees and live prices before trading.

AI Analysis

Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks

PM $20.18M · K 3.78M contracts

Reported volume · provider units

10

Saved contracts

0

Same-question pairs

Source snapshot: Oct 21, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC

About This Event

Before Jan 20, 2029 If the United States has agreed to, signed, or accepted a new Iran-US nuclear deal before X 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes. An agreement also made with other countries, i.e. multilaterally, is still encompassed if the United States participates. "A new Iran-US nuclear deal" means a formal written agreement signed by authorized representatives of both the United States and Iran that, 1, imposes verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program, including limits on uranium enrichment, centrifuge numbers, or nuclear facility operations, AND, 2, provides for the lifting, suspension, or modification of at least one US economic sanction on Iran in exchange for Iran's nuclear commitments. Clarification, 04/19/26: The Agreement Long rulebook variable defines the nature of the qualifying instrument: it must be a formal written agreement signed by authorized representatives of both governments. It does not impose a precondition that the signing itself must occur before resolution. Because the Payout Criterion is satisfied if the United States has "agreed to, signed, or accepted" such an instrument, both governments publicly and officially agreeing to the terms of what will be a qualifying written agreement is sufficient to resolve the market to Yes, even if the formal signing has not yet taken place. Clarification, 06/02/26: X qualifying instrument must impose "verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program." X restriction is "verifiable" only where it establishes a concrete, objectively ascertainable standard, a defined limit, prohibition, quantity, or monitoring provision, against which compliance could in principle be confirmed; a general expression of intent that fixes no such standard is not considered “verifiable” for the purposes of this event. Accordingly, a bare pledge not to develop or pursue nuclear weapons, unaccompanied by any concrete limit on Iran's nuclear materials, activities, or facilities, does not on its own satisfy criterion, 1. Conversely, a commitment to completely 'stop' or ‘suspend’ a specific nuclear activity, such as uranium enrichment, establishes a concrete prohibition, an implicit limit of zero, and qualifies as a restriction, whereas a vague promise to 'reduce' activities without a defined metric or monitoring mechanism does not. The enumerated examples, limits on uranium enrichment, centrifuge numbers, or nuclear facility operations, are illustrative and not exhaustive: a formal, verifiable commitment to remove, transfer, or cap Iran's stock of enriched uranium, confirmable by the receiving state or an oversight body, is a restriction on Iran's nuclear program and satisfies criterion, 1. In every case, criterion, 2, must independently be met. Clarification, 06/17/26: To clarify, the U.S.–Iran memorandum of understanding reportedly now in effect does not satisfy criterion, 1, of the definition of a "new Iran-US nuclear deal," and this market will therefore not resolve to Yes on the basis of that instrument at this time. The memorandum provides for the existing state of Iran's nuclear program to be maintained pending a subsequent agreement, and defers the disposition of Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium to a mechanism to be mutually agreed in that subsequent agreement. That it states a minimum methodology for that future mechanism — down-blending on site under IAEA supervision — constrains the form of a mechanism yet to be agreed, but specifies no quantity, enrichment level, or completion deadline for the down-blending. An instrument that provides for maintaining Iran's nuclear program at an unspecified status quo, or that defers its substantive nuclear commitments to a subsequent agreement, does not by itself establish the concrete, objectively ascertainable standard that a "verifiable" restriction requires. This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.

This analysis is awaiting a background update, so its prices may be older than the odds above.

Current Market Outlook

Kalshi traders currently price a new US-Iran nuclear deal before January 2029 at 54%. That is essentially a coin flip. The market sees a deal as slightly more likely than not, but with massive uncertainty baked into the price. This is not a market pricing in a sure thing. It is a market saying the odds are basically even.

The specific question on Kalshi covers the full remaining term of the current presidential administration, through January 20, 2029. That is a long window. A 54% probability over nearly four years suggests traders expect serious negotiations but also serious obstacles.

Key Factors Driving the Odds

Iran has enriched uranium to 60% purity, just a technical step away from weapons-grade. The IAEA reported in November 2024 that Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state enriching at that level. That creates pressure on both sides to find a deal.

The 2015 JCPOA collapsed after the US withdrew in 2018. Iran then violated almost all its restrictions. A 2024 Congressional Research Service report noted that Iran now has enough enriched material for multiple bombs if it chose to weaponize. That is the backdrop.

The current US administration has signaled openness to diplomacy but has not prioritized Iran. The Biden team held indirect talks in 2021-2022 that nearly produced a deal, but it fell apart over Iran's demand for guarantees that a future US president could not withdraw again. That structural problem remains unsolved.

What Could Change These Odds

The big catalyst is the 2025 US presidential election. If a Republican wins who supports maximum pressure, the deal probability collapses. If the current administration stays, talks could restart. The market price reflects this binary political risk.

Iran's presidential election in June 2025 is another trigger. A moderate president could push for negotiations. A hardliner would likely block them.

The IAEA Board of Governors could refer Iran to the UN Security Council for non-compliance. That would kill deal chances for months. Conversely, a snapback of UN sanctions under the JCPOA's dispute mechanism would also crater the odds.

The 54% price makes sense as a midpoint between the diplomatic status quo and the political uncertainty of the next four years. The market is not predicting a deal. It is predicting that a deal remains possible but faces real headwinds from both Tehran's nuclear advances and Washington's political calendar.

AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.

Saved Jul 23, 2026 UTC

This saved content is awaiting a background update. It may contain outdated claims; use the dated market data and provider rules for the latest available information.

Overview

The US-Iran nuclear deal, formally known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), is a multilateral agreement reached in July 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 countries (the United States, United Kingdom, France, Russia, China, and Germany), plus the European Union. The deal aimed to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for relief from economic sanctions. Under the JCPOA, Iran agreed to restrict its uranium enrichment to 3.67% purity, reduce its enriched uranium stockpile to 300 kilograms, and allow inspections by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). In return, sanctions on Iran's oil exports, banking, and other sectors were lifted. The agreement was seen as a major diplomatic achievement, but it faced opposition from Israel, Saudi Arabia, and many US Republicans who argued it did not address Iran's ballistic missile program or support for proxy groups. In May 2018, President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew the United States from the JCPOA, calling it a 'horrible one-sided deal' and reimposed sanctions on Iran. Iran responded by gradually exceeding the deal's limits on enrichment, stockpile size, and centrifuge development. By 2020, Iran was enriching uranium to 60% purity, close to weapons-grade levels of 90%. The Biden administration, which took office in January 2021, expressed interest in rejoining the deal but negotiations in Vienna from April 2021 to August 2022 failed to restore the JCPOA. Key sticking points included the scope of sanctions relief, Iran's demand for guarantees that future US presidents would not withdraw again, and Iran's enrichment activities. As of 2025, the JCPOA is effectively defunct. Iran has enriched uranium to up to 60% purity and has an estimated stockpile of over 5,000 kilograms of enriched uranium, far exceeding the 300-kilogram limit. The IAEA has reported that Iran is the only non-nuclear-weapon state enriching uranium to 60% and that it has not provided credible answers about undeclared nuclear materials found at several sites. The US has maintained maximum pressure sanctions, while Iran has expanded its nuclear program and deepened ties with Russia and China. The possibility of a new deal in 2026 depends on political will in both countries, the outcome of US elections, and Iran's strategic calculus amid regional tensions. Interest in the topic remains high because a new deal could prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, which would have major consequences for Middle East security, global oil markets, and nonproliferation efforts. Conversely, failure to reach a deal could lead to a nuclear-armed Iran, prompting a regional arms race and potential military conflict. The prediction market asks whether the US and Iran will agree to a new formal written agreement by 2026 that imposes verifiable restrictions on Iran's nuclear program, including limits on uranium enrichment.

Historical Context

The US-Iran nuclear dispute dates back to the 1950s, when the US provided Iran with its first nuclear reactor under the Atoms for Peace program. Iran's nuclear program expanded under the Shah, but after the 1979 Islamic Revolution, the US cut ties and Iran's nuclear activities became more secretive. In the 1990s, the US accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons, leading to sanctions. By 2002, an Iranian opposition group revealed undeclared nuclear facilities at Natanz and Arak, prompting IAEA investigations. Negotiations between Iran and the EU3 (UK, France, Germany) began in 2003 but stalled. In 2006, the UN Security Council imposed sanctions on Iran. The election of Hassan Rouhani in 2013, a moderate, opened the door for talks. The JCPOA was signed on July 14, 2015, after 20 months of negotiations. It was endorsed by UN Security Council Resolution 2231. The deal was implemented in January 2016, with Iran shipping out 98% of its enriched uranium and dismantling centrifuges. The deal unraveled after Trump's withdrawal in 2018. Iran began violating the deal in 2019, enriching to 4.5% and later 60%. By 2021, Iran's breakout time (the time needed to produce enough fissile material for one bomb) had shrunk from 12 months to a few weeks. The Biden administration's attempts to restore the deal failed, and by 2024, the JCPOA was considered dead. The IAEA board of governors passed resolutions criticizing Iran for non-cooperation, and Iran responded by expanding its nuclear program and barring some IAEA inspectors.

Why It Matters

A new US-Iran nuclear deal matters because it directly affects the risk of nuclear proliferation in the Middle East. If Iran obtains a nuclear weapon, it could trigger a regional arms race, with Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Egypt potentially seeking their own bombs. This would destabilize the region and increase the chance of nuclear terrorism or accidental war. The deal also affects global oil markets: Iran has the world's fourth-largest oil reserves, and sanctions have removed about 1-2 million barrels per day from global supply. A deal could bring Iranian oil back, lowering prices and easing inflation. Conversely, no deal could lead to higher oil prices and supply disruptions. The deal also has implications for US relations with allies and adversaries. European allies want the JCPOA restored, while Israel and Gulf states oppose it. Russia and China have used the nuclear issue to expand their influence in Iran. Domestically, a deal could be a major political win for a US president, but it could also face opposition from Congress and pro-Israel groups. The outcome will shape US foreign policy for years and affect global nonproliferation norms.

Was this helpful?
Saved Jul 27, 2026 UTC

AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.

Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

PolymarketPolitics
What will be in a US-Iran deal in 2026?

What will be in a US-Iran deal in 2026?

PM $1.34M
Will any Uranium Enrichment % Cap (1+ Year) be in a US-Iran deal in 2026?Yes 14.5%
Will a ≤5% Uranium Enrichment Cap (1+ Year) be in a US-Iran deal in 2026?Yes 13.5%
Will Dilution of Iranian Uranium be in a US-Iran deal in 2026?Yes 12%
+3 moreNext deadline Jan 1, 2027 UTC
PolymarketPolitics
Who will attend a round of US-Iran peace talks by December 31?

Who will attend a round of US-Iran peace talks by December 31?

PM $1.66M
Will Steve Witkoff attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026?Yes 35.5%
Will Jared Kushner attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026?Yes 35%
Will Abbas Araghchi attend a US x Iran diplomatic meeting by December 31, 2026?Yes 35%
+20 moreNext deadline Dec 31, 2026 UTC
PolymarketPolitics
Where will the next US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting take place...?

Where will the next US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting take place...?

PM $170.3K
Will no qualifying US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting take place by December 31, 2026?Yes 60%
Will the next US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting take place in Qatar by December 31, 2026?Yes 18.2%
Will the next US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting take place in Switzerland by December 31, 2026?Yes 6.8%
+16 moreNext deadline Jan 1, 2027 UTC
PolymarketPolitics
US-Iran ceasefire continues through...?

US-Iran ceasefire continues through...?

PM $19.36M
US x Iran ceasefire continues through October 22?Yes 94.8%
US x Iran ceasefire continues through October 24?Yes 89.5%
US x Iran ceasefire continues through October 28?Yes 85.5%
+6 moreNext deadline Oct 23, 2026 UTC
PolymarketPolitics
US-Saudi nuclear deal enters into force in 2026?

US-Saudi nuclear deal enters into force in 2026?

PM $40.4K
US-Saudi nuclear deal enters into force in 2026?Yes 8.5%
1 mktNext deadline Jan 1, 2027 UTC
PolymarketPolitics
US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by...?

US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by...?

PM $2.30M
US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by December 31?Yes 32.5%
US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by November 30?Yes 25.5%
US-Iran Hormuz Agreement by November 2?Yes 11.5%
+1 moreNext deadline Nov 1, 2026 UTC

Market Insights

Price gaps of 2 pp+

0

Same-question pairs

0

No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.

Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.