BackKKALSHI

Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?

Yes0%

Vol$0.00

Outcomes2

TradeTrade on Kalshi

Event

MarketKALSHIactive

MarketKALSHIactiveOther

Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?

Part of: Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?

NoNo Price

100¢

VolTotal Volume

$0.00

Outcomes

Ends

Jan 8, 2028

in about 1 year

Trade on Kalshi

Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?

100¢

Vol

$0.00

Outcomes

Trade

Yes0.1¢

No100.0¢

Price History

Will United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit rule holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit?

No historical data available

Price history will appear here when available

Resolution Information

Status

Active

Expected Resolution

January 08, 2028

3:00 PM GMT+0

Official Sources

Markets are resolved using official government and institutional sources.

Learn more

Accuracy

100%

Resolved

8,750

Avg Time

< 24 hours

Disputes

Resolution Criteria

If United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit holds that the False Claims Act’s qui tam provisions violate Article II of the Constitution when the United States declines to intervene in the underlying False Claims Act action and the private relator continues the suit in United States ex rel. Clarissa Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., before Jan 1, 2028, then the market resolves to Yes. The ruling must: Be issued by United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in United States ex rel. Clarissa Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., Address the matter described by the specified judgment Be issued through a written order, opinion, judgment, or decision The following do NOT satisfy the Payout Criterion: Oral rulings from the bench unless reduced to a written order Tentative rulings that are not made final Draft opinions that leak but are not officially issued Settlements or voluntary dismissals Administrative or scheduling orders Orders to show cause Minute orders that do not address the substantive issue in the specified judgment For clarity: If the case is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, that counts as a ruling only if the judgment refers to jurisdiction Sua sponte rulings count if they match the specified judgment Per curiam opinions and summary orders count as rulings If multiple judges issue separate opinions, the majority/plurality opinion controls This market will close and expire early if the event occurs.

Market Still Active

This market has not yet resolved. Resolution will occur after the specified end date based on the criteria above.

Resolution Info

Market Stats

Resolution Countdown

453 Days Left

January 08, 2028 • 3:00 PM

Last Updated

less than a minute ago

Event Group

Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?

Event

Will the 11th Circuit rule non-intervened False Claims Act qui tam suits unconstitutional?