Paired binary contracts where one pays 1 if it doesn't ("No"). Yes + No ≈ $1 before fees/spread.
#Plain-English Definition
Yes/No shares are the two complementary sides of a binary market. Think of them like opposite sides of a coin flip: exactly one side must win. Each side is a $1-settled contract:
- A Yes share pays 0 otherwise.
- A No share pays 0 otherwise.
Because the outcomes are complements, their prices are linked: Yes + No ≈ $1 before fees/spread. Small differences come from the bid-ask spread, fees, and rounding.
#The $1.00 Equation
(Note: Blue = YES Price, Orange = NO Price. They always stack to $1.00)
#History and Origins
The yes/no share structure traces its roots to the earliest forms of prediction markets. While informal betting on binary outcomes existed for centuries, the modern framework emerged in the late 1980s.
Key milestones:
- 1988: The Iowa Electronic Markets (IEM) pioneered standardized yes/no contracts for presidential elections, establishing the $1-settlement convention still used today.
- 2001: Intrade popularized yes/no trading for diverse events, from Oscar winners to geopolitical outcomes.
- 2004: HedgeStreet (later NADEX) became the first CFTC-designated contract market for binary event contracts in the United States.
- 2020: Polymarket launched on blockchain, making yes/no shares accessible globally via cryptocurrency.
- 2020: Kalshi received CFTC designation, bringing regulated yes/no contracts to U.S. retail traders.
The $1.00 settlement value became standard because it creates a direct mapping between price and probability; a 65-cent share implies 65% probability without requiring conversion.
#Yes vs No: Comparison Table
| Attribute | Yes Share | No Share |
|---|---|---|
| Pays $1 if | Event occurs | Event does NOT occur |
| Pays $0 if | Event does not occur | Event occurs |
| Price interpretation | Implied probability of event | Implied probability of non-event |
| Bullish on outcome | Buy Yes | Sell Yes (or buy No) |
| Bearish on outcome | Sell Yes (or buy No) | Buy No |
| Maximum profit | $1 - purchase price | $1 - purchase price |
| Maximum loss | Purchase price | Purchase price |
| Typical use | Expect event to happen | Expect event NOT to happen |
Price relationship example:
| Yes Price | No Price | Sum | Spread |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.65 | $0.35 | $1.00 | None (mid-market) |
| $0.65 (ask) | $0.37 (ask) | $1.02 | $0.02 (cost to buy both) |
| $0.63 (bid) | $0.35 (bid) | $0.98 | $0.02 (proceeds from selling both) |
#How It Works
- Read the question and rules. The market's resolution criteria define exactly what counts as "Yes" or "No".
- Choose your side. Buy Yes if you think the event will happen; buy No if you think it won't.
- Pay the market price. Each share is priced between 1 (exact tick size and fee model vary by platform).
- Settle or exit early.
- Hold to resolution: the correct side pays 0.
- Or sell before resolution to lock gains or cut losses (subject to spread, liquidity, and fees).
Quick math: Treat
price in $as approximate probability in%. Example: Yes price of$0.58 ≈ 58%implies No ≈$0.42, so0.58 + 0.42 = 1.00(before fees/spread).
#Illustrative Examples
Example 1: Sports Market Market: "Will the Lakers make the playoffs?"
- Quoted prices: Yes 0.35 (0.65 + 0.35 = 1.00).
- You believe 80% chance, so you buy 100 Yes at 65**.
- If Lakers make it: receive 35 before fees.
- If they miss: payout 65.
Example 2: Policy Market Market: "Will the Federal Reserve raise rates at next meeting?"
- Quoted prices: Yes 0.20 (0.80 + 0.20 = 1.00).
- You think unlikely, buy 50 No at 10**.
- If no rate hike: receive 40 before fees.
- If rates rise: payout 10.
Example 3: Arbitrage Note If Yes + No < 0.61 + 0.99), buying one of each costs 1.00 at resolution ($0.01** before fees). In practice, spread, fees, and slippage usually eliminate this edge.
#Trading Strategy & Guidance
When to trade each type:
- Buy Yes when your probability estimate exceeds the Yes price
- Buy No when your probability estimate is below the Yes price
- Sell existing positions when prices move favorably or your view changes
Critical considerations:
- Read resolution criteria carefully. Time zones, data sources, and exact thresholds matter. Small wording differences can flip payouts.
- Mind the spread and depth. Thin order books widen spreads and increase slippage on market orders. Use limit orders when possible.
- Exit vs hold. Selling early captures gains but pays the spread twice. Holding avoids exit spread but locks in outcome risk.
- Fees vary by platform. Break-even probabilities depend on fee structure; some charge on trades, others on winnings.
#Platform Comparison: Yes/No Shares
Different platforms implement yes/no shares with distinct mechanics:
| Feature | Polymarket | Kalshi | NADEX |
|---|---|---|---|
| Currency | USDC (cryptocurrency) | USD | USD |
| Settlement | $1.00 in USDC | $1.00 | $100 |
| Matching system | Order book + AMM | Order book | Order book |
| Fee structure | No trading fees | ~$0.01-0.03 per contract | ~$1 per contract |
| Regulation | Offshore (non-US users) | CFTC-regulated | CFTC-regulated |
| Redemption | Manual claim required | Automatic | Automatic |
| Position limits | None | 100K per market | Varies |
#Common Pitfalls & Edge Cases
- Ambiguous resolutions. If criteria are unclear or source data changes, disputes arise. Some platforms have "invalid" outcomes or appeals; specifics vary by platform.
- Trading halts. Markets may pause near resolution, during major news, or if manipulation is suspected. Orders can be rejected or partially filled.
- Low liquidity traps. You might buy easily but struggle to sell later. Displayed prices may not reflect executable prices for larger orders.
- Platform differences. Some use cryptocurrency (e.g., Polymarket), others USD (e.g., Kalshi). Share creation methods vary by platform; some use automated market makers, others order books.
- Rounding errors. On some platforms, Yes + No may equal 1.01 due to tick size constraints. This is not an arbitrage opportunity after accounting for fees.
#Related Terms
- Binary Market
- Implied Probability
- Spread
- Liquidity
- Resolution Criteria
- Order Book
- Limit Order
- Slippage
#FAQ
#Why do Yes and No prices not always sum to exactly $1.00?
The sum can deviate slightly due to bid-ask spreads. If you're looking at ask prices (what you'd pay to buy), the sum often exceeds 1.00. This reflects the cost of immediate execution, not a trading opportunity.
#Can I hold both Yes and No shares simultaneously?
Yes, but there's no financial benefit. Equal amounts of Yes and No form a "complete set" worth exactly $1.00; you'd lock up capital with no upside. However, you might temporarily hold both if you've partially exited a position or are implementing a complex strategy.
#Is buying Yes the same as selling (shorting) No?
Economically similar but mechanically different. Buying Yes means you pay cash now for shares that might pay 1.00 later. On many prediction market platforms, you simply buy the opposite side rather than shorting.
#What happens to my shares at market resolution?
Winning shares (Yes if the event occurs, No if it doesn't) become redeemable for 0.00. On blockchain platforms like Polymarket, you must manually redeem winnings. On centralized platforms like Kalshi, your balance may update automatically.
#Why would someone buy a share priced at $0.95?
The 0.05) - (0.02 × 0.049 - 0.03 expected profit per share. Small edges at high prices can be worthwhile with proper position sizing.