
CISA issues emergency directive by...?
PM $2.7K
1
2
CISA issues emergency directive by...?

PM $2.7K
1
2
Current odds
Snapshot from
As of Oct 30, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC, the highest-priced outcome on Polymarket is March 31 at 57%.
Polymarket
- March 3157%
- December 3126.5%
Yes prices. They are not order quotes; check each platform's rules, fees and live prices before trading.
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $2.7K
Reported volume · provider units
2
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 30, 2026, 12:00 PM UTC
About This Event
This market will resolve to “Yes” if the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) issues and publicly confirms the issuance of a new Emergency Directive between market creation and the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A qualifying Emergency Directive is any new directive formally designated by CISA as an “Emergency Directive”, regardless of its subject matter. Binding Operational Directives, additions to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog, alerts, advisories, and other guidance will not qualify. Supplemental direction, revised versions, or other updates to any existing Emergency Directive will also not qualify. The date of issuance shown by CISA will be used to determine whether the directive was issued within this market's timeframe. Where an issuance time is available, it will be converted to ET. If CISA provides only an issuance date and that date is the market’s creation date in ET, the directive will qualify only if official information or a consensus of credible reporting establishes that issuance occurred after market creation. A directive issued before market creation will not qualify merely because it is publicly announced during the market period. Both the issuance and its public confirmation must occur by the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. The primary resolution source for this market will be CISA's directives page (https://www.cisa.gov/directives); however, official CISA announcements and a consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
This analysis is awaiting a background update, so its prices may be older than the odds above.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-27T00:00:05.999Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
This event asks whether the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) will issue a new Emergency Directive. The source says the market resolves "Yes" if CISA "issues and publicly confirms the issuance of a new Emergency Directive between market creation and the listed date, 11:59 PM ET" [1]. Binding Operational Directives, Known Exploited Vulnerabilities additions, alerts, advisories, and updates to existing directives do not qualify [1].
The two markets in this snapshot differ in deadline. One closes at the "March 31, 2027" listing, with a provider end time of 2027-04-01T03:59:00.000Z [1]. The other asks about "December 31, 2026," with an end time of 2027-01-01T04:59:00.000Z [1]. Both end times correspond to 11:59 PM ET on the named date, so the contracts are not interchangeable: a directive issued between the two deadlines would count only for the later contract.
Reading the snapshot
The provider observation time is 2026-10-27T00:00:05.999Z, and the source was retrieved at 2026-10-27T02:25:42.563Z [1]. These are the times for this snapshot only. They do not show current prices at any later moment.
In the March 31, 2027 market, the quoted Yes price is 0.505 and the No price is 0.495 [1]. In the December 31, 2026 market, the Yes price is 0.27 and the No price is 0.73 [1]. Each contract's two quotes sum to 1.00 in this snapshot. These are displayed prices, not executable quotes or verified probabilities, and they do not explain why the prices are where they are.
Because the later deadline is a longer window, the two contracts can be read side by side within this event. Do not compare them with markets on other platforms or in other events, since wording and close times may differ.
What remains uncertain
The sample includes both saved markets for this provider event, and the source reports no partial sampling [1]. That does not establish that these two contracts cover every possible outcome or every real-world contract about CISA. The selection note also describes the saved event, not the full field [1].
The rules allow CISA's directives page as the primary resolution source, with official announcements and a consensus of credible reporting as additional sources [1]. The rules also state that a directive issued on the market creation date counts only if official information or credible reporting establishes issuance after creation [1]. The provided evidence does not include any directive status beyond these snapshots.
References
- Polymarket: CISA issues emergency directive by...?. Provider data observed 2026-10-27T00:00:05.999Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 27, 2026 UTCThis saved content is awaiting a background update. It may contain outdated claims; use the dated market data and provider rules for the latest available information.
Overview
This PredictPedia entry covers a Polymarket contract asking whether the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) will issue a new Emergency Directive by a stated deadline. The contract resolves to "Yes" if CISA issues and publicly confirms the issuance of a new Emergency Directive between market creation and the listed date at 11:59 PM ET, and to "No" otherwise [1]. The question is narrow. It asks about one formal type of CISA action, not about cybersecurity threats in general. The saved event includes two markets with the same underlying question but different deadlines: one ending March 31, 2027, and one ending December 31, 2026 [1]. Each market is a separate contract with its own end date. The entry does not treat the two as one combined question, and the deadline in a contract title is a resolution cutoff, not a forecast of when a directive will be issued. The resolution rules define what counts. A qualifying Emergency Directive is any new directive that CISA formally designates as an "Emergency Directive," regardless of subject matter [1]. Several related CISA outputs do not count under the rules. These include Binding Operational Directives, additions to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, alerts, advisories, and other guidance. Supplemental direction, revised versions, or other updates to an existing Emergency Directive also do not count [1]. Timing rules matter. The date of issuance shown by CISA determines whether a directive falls within the market's timeframe, and where an issuance time is available it is converted to ET [1]. If CISA gives only a date that matches the market's creation date in ET, the directive qualifies only if official information or a consensus of credible reporting shows that issuance happened after market creation [1]. A directive issued before creation does not qualify just because it is announced during the market period. Both issuance and public confirmation must occur by the listed deadline [1]. The primary resolution source is CISA's directives page. Official CISA announcements and a consensus of credible reporting may also be used [1]. The provider's sample for this event contains only these two markets, and the saved coverage is marked as complete for the included event [1]. That establishes the markets saved for this event, not every possible question about CISA. Prices shown elsewhere on this page are snapshots from the provider and are not executable quotes or verified probabilities.
Historical Context
Wikipedia describes a 2020 cyberattack, suspected to have been committed by a group backed by the Russian government, that penetrated thousands of organizations globally, including multiple parts of the US federal government. The source says it was reported to be among the worst cyber-espionage incidents ever suffered by the US, and that affected organizations included NATO, the UK government, the European Parliament, and Microsoft [3]. The sources supplied for this entry do not connect that incident to any CISA Emergency Directive, so it should be read only as background on the threat environment, not as a cause of any directive or of the market's pricing.
Why It Matters
The contract measures a single, formally designated federal cybersecurity action within a fixed window. Because only CISA-designated Emergency Directives qualify, the contract is more specific than questions about cyber alerts, vulnerability listings, or general threat activity [1]. Its resolution depends on CISA's own directives page and on official or credibly reported confirmation of issuance timing [1]. That makes the rules about issuance date, creation date, and confirmation timing central to how the market settles, and those rules are where readers should focus when interpreting the question.
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-27 at 00:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
What counts as a qualifying CISA Emergency Directive for this contract?
Any new directive formally designated by CISA as an "Emergency Directive" qualifies, regardless of its subject matter [1].
Do Binding Operational Directives or KEV Catalog additions count?
No. Binding Operational Directives, additions to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog, alerts, advisories, and other guidance are excluded [1].
Does an update to an existing Emergency Directive count?
No. Supplemental direction, revised versions, or other updates to an existing Emergency Directive do not qualify [1].
What happens if a directive was issued before market creation but announced during the market period?
It will not qualify merely because it is publicly announced during the market period. Issuance and public confirmation must both occur by the listed date [1].
Where will the market be resolved?
The primary resolution source is CISA's directives page. Official CISA announcements and a consensus of credible reporting may also be used [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

Who will officially lead Venezuela at the end of 2026?
PM $99.20M · K 5.95M contractsWill Nicolás Maduro be the leader of Venezuela end of 2026?
Kalshi: Will Nicolás Maduro be the head of state of Venezuela on Dec 31, 2026?
Related contracts
Will Delcy Rodríguez be the leader of Venezuela end of 2026?
Kalshi: Will Delcy Rodríguez be the head of state of Venezuela on Dec 31, 2026?
Related contracts
Will María Corina Machado be the leader of Venezuela end of 2026?
Kalshi: Will María Corina Machado be the head of state of Venezuela on Dec 31, 2026?
Related contracts
Related or unreviewed contracts may settle differently. Their gap is not an equivalent-contract comparison.
Saved prices; check contract rules.

Who will succeed Netanyahu as Prime Minister of Israel?
K 139.1K contracts
When will traffic at the Strait of Hormuz return to normal?
PM $21.29M · K 11.10M contractsStrait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by December 31?
Kalshi: Will the 7-day moving average of transit calls through the Strait of Hormuz as reported by the IMF PortWatch be above 60 before January 1, 2027?
Related contracts
Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by October 31?
Kalshi: Will the 7-day moving average of transit calls through the Strait of Hormuz as reported by the IMF PortWatch be above 60 after July 6, 2026 and before Jan 1, 2027?
Related contracts
Strait of Hormuz traffic returns to normal by November 30?
Kalshi: Will the 7-day moving average of transit calls through the Strait of Hormuz as reported by the IMF PortWatch be above 60 before December 1, 2026?
Related contracts
Related or unreviewed contracts may settle differently. Their gap is not an equivalent-contract comparison.
Saved prices; check contract rules.

More tech layoffs in 2026 than in 2025?
PM $26.1K · K 31.50M contractsNo comparable saved prices

Best LLM at the end of the decade?
PM $7.75M · K 17.31M contractsWill Anthropic be the second-best AI lab at the end of October 2026?
Kalshi: Best AI on Dec 31, 2026? (Claude)
Related contracts
Will Google have the best AI model at the end of October 2026?
Kalshi: Best LLM at the end of the decade? (Google)
Related contracts
Will Google have the best AI model at the end of October 2026?
Kalshi: Best AI on Dec 31, 2026? (Gemini)
Related contracts
Related or unreviewed contracts may settle differently. Their gap is not an equivalent-contract comparison.
Saved prices; check contract rules.

Which companies will be acquired this year?
PM $18.42M · K 107.1K contractsWill PayPal be acquired before 2027?
Kalshi: Will any company announce acquisition of PayPal before Jan 1, 2027?
Same question, fine print differs
Will Viking Therapeutics be acquired before 2027?
Kalshi: Will any company announce acquisition of Viking Therapeutics before Jan 1, 2027?
Same question, fine print differs
Will GitLab be acquired before 2027?
Kalshi: Will any company announce acquisition of GitLab before Jan 1, 2027?
Same question, fine print differs
Related or unreviewed contracts may settle differently. Their gap is not an equivalent-contract comparison.
Saved prices; check contract rules.
Market Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.


