
US x Cuba diplomatic meeting by...?
PM $38.9K
1
1
US x Cuba diplomatic meeting by...?

PM $38.9K
1
1
Current odds
Snapshot from
As of Oct 21, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC, the highest-priced outcome on Polymarket is October 31 at 10%.
Polymarket
- October 3110%
Yes prices. They are not order quotes; check each platform's rules, fees and live prices before trading.
AI Analysis
Trader mode: Market mechanics, assumptions and risks
PM $38.9K
Reported volume · provider units
1
Saved contracts
0
Same-question pairs
Source snapshot: Oct 21, 2026, 3:00 AM UTC
About This Event
This market will resolve to "Yes" if there is a diplomatic meeting between representatives of the United States and Cuba between market creation and the listed date, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve to “No”. A diplomatic meeting refers to a deliberate meeting between representatives of the listed countries who are acting in an official capacity and are authorized to engage in negotiation or diplomacy regarding US-Cuba relations on behalf of their governments. Meetings conducted indirectly, for example, through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify. Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count. The meeting must be in-person and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media. Remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count. The resolution sources for this market will be official information from the governments of the United States and Cuba, and a consensus of credible reporting.
Snapshot observed 2026-10-20T03:00:06.020Z. This analysis describes that snapshot and is not a live news update.
What the contract measures
The contract asks whether representatives of the United States and Cuba hold a diplomatic meeting between market creation and the listed end time. The rules say the market resolves "Yes" if such a meeting occurs and "No" otherwise [1]. The meeting must be in person and must be "publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media" [1]. Indirect meetings through "designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors" qualify, but "Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks otherwise not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation will not count" [1]. Remote meetings and phone calls do not count [1].
The listed end time is 2026-11-01T03:59:00.000Z, which the rules describe as "11:59 PM ET" on the listed date [1]. The market title, "US x Cuba diplomatic meeting by October 31?", matches that deadline [1]. Only the listed end time is the close time for this contract. The rules name official government information and consensus credible reporting as resolution sources [1].
Reading the snapshot
The saved data covers one Polymarket event with one binary market [1]. The Yes price is 0.095 and the No price is 0.905 [1]. These figures were observed at 2026-10-20T03:00:06.020Z and retrieved at 2026-10-20T05:26:18.998Z [1]. They describe that saved snapshot only and do not show the price at any later time.
Because the sample is complete for this event and includes every saved market, nothing is omitted from the two-outcome field. The Yes and No prices are the only quoted outcomes in the record. Prices are snapshots, not executable quotes, and they should not be read as verified probabilities. The record also contains no volume or liquidity data, so it says nothing about how much trading occurred or how deep the market is.
This record contains no other platform, so no cross-platform comparison is possible. Differences in wording between similar contracts on other platforms would need to be checked against their own rules before any comparison.
What remains uncertain
The evidence does not explain why the prices are where they are, and it does not show any news or event that may have affected them. It also does not establish whether any meeting has occurred or been reported, since the record covers only the rules and a single price snapshot. Readers should check the official resolution sources named in the rules and monitor the listed end time in the rules, while noting that the saved snapshot predates the retrieval time by about two and a half hours.
References
- Polymarket: US x Cuba diplomatic meeting by...?. Provider data observed 2026-10-20T03:00:06.020Z.
AI-generated analysis based on market data. Not financial advice.
Saved Oct 20, 2026 UTCOverview
This contract asks whether representatives of the United States and Cuba will hold a diplomatic meeting within a set window. Under the rules in the provider record, the meeting must be in person, must involve representatives acting in an official capacity who are authorized to negotiate or conduct diplomacy on US-Cuba relations, and must be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media [1]. Meetings held indirectly through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors can qualify if the governments know about and authorize them [1]. The rules exclude brief greetings, chance encounters, and talks not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation [1]. Remote meetings, phone calls, and other meetings where the parties are not physically present do not count [1]. The contract title uses the phrase "by" with a listed date of October 31. The provider record gives the listed end time as 2026-11-01T03:59:00.000Z, and the contract text describes the cutoff as 11:59 PM ET on the listed date [1]. The window opens at market creation and closes at that cutoff, so only meetings within that period fall under the rules [1]. The record does not state the market creation time, so the exact start of the window cannot be confirmed from the supplied material. The provider names two resolution sources: official information from the governments of the United States and Cuba, and a consensus of credible reporting [1]. A contract that resolves "Yes" needs a qualifying meeting, while a "No" resolution applies if no qualifying meeting occurs in the window [1]. The background sources describe the general state of relations, but they do not describe any specific meeting or negotiation. Wikipedia's entry on the United States embargo against Cuba states that the embargo has prevented U.S. businesses and citizens from conducting trade or commerce with Cuban interests since 1960, and that modern diplomatic relations are cold, stemming from historic conflict and divergent political ideologies [2]. These are encyclopedic background points and do not confirm any present-day development.
Historical Context
The United States embargo against Cuba has been in place since 1960, and the sources describe it as the most enduring trade embargo in modern history [2]. The United Nations has formally condemned the embargo intermittently since 1992 because of its adverse effects on Cubans [2]. An earlier episode, the Cuban Missile Crisis, was a 13-day confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union, running from 16 to 28 October 1962, which is widely considered the closest the Cold War came to full-scale nuclear war [3]. These events are historical background. The sources do not link them to the diplomatic meeting described in this contract.
Why It Matters
The contract measures a narrow event: an in-person, officially authorized diplomatic meeting between US and Cuban representatives, publicly acknowledged or reported by credible media, within a defined window [1]. It does not measure broader improvement in relations, trade policy changes, or the outcome of any negotiation, because the rules define only the meeting itself [1]. Because the rules count indirect meetings through authorized mediators but exclude calls, remote meetings, and chance encounters, the wording of the criteria determines what qualifies [1]. Background on the embargo and the historical tensions between the two countries helps explain why such a meeting is notable, but it does not establish whether one will occur [2][3].
Snapshot context
The latest published provider snapshot for this topic was observed on 2026-10-20 at 03:00 UTC. It contains listings from Polymarket. Market descriptions and listed closing times define the contracts; they do not establish that the real-world outcome has occurred. This article does not include a separately verified news update. [1]
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a phone call or video call between US and Cuban officials count?
No. The rules state that remote meetings, phone calls, or other meetings where the relevant parties are not present will not count, and the meeting must be in person [1].
Do indirect talks through a mediator count?
They can. The rules say meetings conducted indirectly, for example through designated mediators, facilitators, or interlocutors acting with the knowledge and authorization of the relevant governments, will qualify [1].
Does a brief greeting or chance encounter count?
No. Brief greetings, chance encounters, or talks not deliberately aimed at diplomacy or negotiation do not count [1].
How is the outcome determined?
The resolution sources are official information from the governments of the United States and Cuba, together with a consensus of credible reporting [1]. The meeting must either be publicly acknowledged by either government or reported by a consensus of credible media [1].
Does the history of the embargo decide whether a meeting happens?
No. The embargo background describes long-running restrictions and cold relations [2], but the contract turns only on whether a qualifying meeting occurs within the window [1].
AI-written background. References identify the evidence used; Wikipedia links under Learn More are additional reading. Prices and provider rules are dated snapshots. This is not financial advice.
Related prediction markets
Prices are catalog snapshots and may have changed. Check each market's rules and observation time.

Who will attend a round of US-Iran peace talks by December 31?
PM $1.66M
Where will the next US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting take place...?
PM $170.3K
Next US-Iran senior diplomatic meeting by...?
PM $791.0K
US x North Korea diplomatic meeting by...?
PM $3.9K
Russia x Ukraine any diplomatic meeting by...?
PM $652.5K
US-Canada diplomatic agreement to lower tariffs by...?
PM $262.0KMarket Insights
Price gaps of 2 pp+
0
Same-question pairs
0
No outcomes on this page have been reviewed as the same question on both platforms yet.
Price differences do not establish arbitrage. Check each pair's review, current order prices, fees and settlement rules.
